Safeguarding modern midwifery

About the Author

Uniting clinical expertise and legal perspective to reveal how midwifery is interpreted—and often misinterpreted—across courts and hospitals.

Martha E Merrill-Hall portrait
Martha E Merrill-Hall JD MS CNM

Martha has led CNM practice across private, Indian Health Service, hospitalist, and critical access settings while litigating personal injury and professional malpractice cases.

Today she researches verdict trends, policy shifts, and licensure actions from the Rocky Mountains—equipping midwives, patients, and counsel with grounded legal insight.

Back to About

Why midwives & counsel read

Dual license perspective

Decades of private, IHS, hospitalist, and critical access CNM practice pair with JD work representing both plaintiffs and defendants in professional malpractice.

  • Pro bono defense of advanced practice providers facing board actions.
  • Expert witness experience in midwifery negligence claims.

Where I've practiced

Licensed across Colorado, Montana, Nebraska, Iowa, New Mexico, California, and beyond—spanning CNM hospitalist teams, Indian Health Service care, and cardiology/critical care nursing roots in Vermont and Maine.

Today I research verdicts, legal seminars, and policy shifts from the Rocky Mountains.

What Martha hopes readers gain

  • Historical context for how CNMs/CMs secured hospital privileges and where culture still lags clinical reality.
  • Plain-language breakdowns of licensure boundaries, malpractice myths, and courtroom expectations.
  • Validation for midwives, attorneys, and patients who need equitable framing of the profession’s contributions.
  • Strategies to translate courtroom narratives back into safe bedside practice.

May 15, 2025

Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act - Part I

Updated January 12, 2026

Tingey Injury Law Firm                              unsplash image
Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on Unsplash

EMTALA:

EMTALA is the Federal Statute, enacted in 1986, that eliminated the historic, common-law precept of “no duty to treat. Until its drafting and codification, physicians were not duty-bound to treat anyone but their own patients. Since EMTALA became law, hospital triage departments (ER and OB) have a duty to timely and thoroughly evaluate each individual presenting for care, regardless of insurance status or ability to pay.1

Gayatri Malhotra                                                            unsplash image
Photo by Gayatri Malhotra on Unsplash

Patients Presenting To OB Triage

When a pregnant patient presents to a hospital OB triage unit for care, EMTALA requires that the evaluating physician or midwife perform a medical screening exam (MSE) to determine whether an emergency medical condition (EMC) exists. Pregnant patients are not considered to have an (EMC) if they are certified to be in false labor or there is time for a safe transfer to another hospital prior to delivery.2 Under the Statute, those experiencing contractions are only considered stabilized after the baby and placenta are delivered, the laboring patient no longer has discernible contractions, or “a physician, certified nurse-midwife, or another qualified medical person (QMP) certifies that the individual is experiencing false labor.”.3

EMTALA Violations in OB Triage

Common EMTALA violations in OB Triage include improper or inadequate physical evaluation of mother and baby, improper discharge home from triage, (discharge and transfer are considered to be equivalent according to the Statute), improper refusal by an on-call midwife to come to the triage unit and perform an examination, failure of the midwife to rule out active phase labor, or failure to certify false labor. Timely initial assessments, stabilizing care, and the ability to evaluate and act according to patient acuity are additional components of care required by EMTALA.4

Monetary Fines For EMTALA Violations

Fines up to $50,000 can be imposed on hospitals, physicians, and other clinicians (CNMs and APRNs) for violating the Statute. Unlike a malpractice lawsuit, monetary penalties are not awarded to injured parties. Penalties for EMTALA violations are paid directly to the United States Treasury Department. Those individuals harmed by violations of EMTALA may seek private attorney representation, enabling civil money penalties to be awarded for their triage injuries and losses.5 (See EMTALA: Treating patients with emergency medical conditions and risk of violating State statutes).

1. Rosenbaum S, Cartright-Smith L, Hirsch J. Case Studies at Denver Health: patient dumping in the emergency department despite EMTALA, the law that banned it. Health Affairs. 2012;31(8):1-17.

2. Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act, 42 CFR 489.24(b), definition of Transfer. 42 USC 1395dd(e)(1)(8); 42 CFR 49.24(b) definition of emergency medical condition.

3. Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act, 42 CFR 489.24: Special responsibilities of Medicare hospitals in emergency cases; (2)(ii). 42 CFR 489.24(a)(i),(c).

4. Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act. 42 USC 1395dd(d); 42 CFR 1003, 103(e); 45 CFR 102.3.

http://www.midwivesontrial.com

© 2023 Martha Merrill-Hall